OG2 - professors appearance in TV programs and its outcomes.
Both the reading and the speaking state about the appearance of professors on TV programs and its consequences for the people, universities, and themselves. While the passage brings three reasons to support the benefits of their appearances on TV, the lecturer claims that it is not suitable for professors to attend these programs.
Firstly, the text mentions that professors need to be prominent among a broader range of audience. While they are in the campus, their reputation is limited to other scholars working in universities, but with appearing in TV shows, thousands of people become aware of their notions which leads to a more significant impact on society. In contrast, the professor suggests that the professors tend to get a reputation among other scholars and appearing in TV programs creates a blurry perspective out of them showing a person who prefers entertainment rather than research and being a serious scholar. Thus, gathering academic funds will become a severe problem for them.
Secondly, the passage indicates that when people get to know a knowledgable faculty member of a specific university on TV, gradually the prominence of that university will be enhanced among the public, and the university will benefit from more donations. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes the claim, asserting that taking part in TV programs needs spending lots of time ob rehearsing, traveling to the TV studio and even trying to look good other than spending time on campus, doing research, business and being with students. In this regard, universities will not benefit from the appearance of the professors on TV.
Finally, the reading points out that when professors share their views on TV, they give the viewers the chance of learning more about issues deeply. Moreover, their appearance leads to a new taste of real insight and expertise for the audience. The listening refuses the idea, stating that there are lots of knowledge to show on TV, and they don't incline to probe issues deeply. In this regard, the professors have to investigate the events as they are not complicated so that the views and thoughts are not much different from a university homework.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ts of knowledge to show on TV, and they dont incline to probe issues deeply. In this...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 30.3222958057 178% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 357.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13445378151 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78871763944 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4415701216 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4615384615 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293913776556 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113415067851 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916699861032 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197723210718 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767498383941 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.