Palm oil, a liquid produced by palm trees and used for cooking and other purposes, has become very popular in recent years. As a result, the palm oil industry has had a dramatic impact on the economies and landscapes of countries in which it operates. When asked to make a recommendation about whether expanding palm oil production even more would be good or bad for the environment and the economy, many experts have stated that palm oil production has several positive effects and should be expanded.
First, the experts point out that palm tree farming helps preserve the world’s forests. Palm trees have a very high oil yield – far higher than that of other crops. For this reason, farming palm trees requires less land than farming other crops to produce the same economic value. Since palm tree farms require relatively little land (compared with many other crops), palm tree plantations require the clearing of smaller areas of forest than many other crops would. In other words, palm tree farms cause less deforestation and therefore have a lesser negative impact on the environment than other types of crops.
Second, palm oil is sometimes used to produce biodiesel, a fuel for motor vehicles. Using biodiesel in vehicle engines create fewer carbon emissions than using traditional fossil fuels does. Carbon emissions are known to contribute to climate change. Biodiesel from palm oil, when used as an alternative to fossil fuels, can help reduce this effect.
Third, palm oil production helps reduce poverty among small-scale farmers. About 50 percent to 70 percent of land used for farming in palm-oil-producing countries is actually cleared by small-scale, low-income family farmers. Growing palm trees is usually more profitable for such farmers than growing other crops, and it has in many cases helped improve the farmers’ standard of living.
Based on the reading passage, palm oil which is a liquid product from palm trees for several purposes has become very popular in recent years. Therefore, keeping this in perspective palm oil industry has had a huge impact on the economies an several positive effects that should be expended. The professor in the lecture cast-doubt on those positive effects and suggesting three reasons concerning why they seems harmful.
The first point mentioned in the lecture is, palm tree farming helps preserve forest in all over the world. The lecture challenged this point as, the world demand for palm oil is increasing very fast. The reading does not take into consideration that, for keep up with this growing demand more land will need and this mean more forest and natural habitant should be destroyed in order to farming palm. Therefore, this whole point regarding, less deforestation is refuted by the lecturer.
Although it is suggested in the reading that, palm oil is used to produce biodiesel that is a fuel for vehicles and create fewer pollution. this point in refuted in the lecture as, increasing use biodiesel means more demand for palm trees and more deforestation. Another point is mentioned to question the validity of this claim is, clear a lot of lands from trees make more carbon dioxide and this is make more pollution, Hence, the fact that fewer pollution by more farming palm trees, cannot make sense.
The author in the reading passage asserts that, palm oil reduce poverty. this point is, further, called into question on the grounds that it could not make people more reach because it’s not more profitable than farming other crops. In fact, the reading fails to consider the fact that growing palm trees frame make a lot people in rival for selling their products. Thereby, the validity of this claim in the reading is also in question.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... has had a huge impact on the economies an several positive effects that should be...
^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ct on the economies an several positive effects that should be expended. The professor ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...sting three reasons concerning why they seems harmful. The first point mentioned i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... preserve forest in all over the world. The lecture challenged this point as, the w...
^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d for palm oil is increasing very fast. The reading does not take into consideratio...
^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less pollution'?
Suggestion: less pollution
... that is a fuel for vehicles and create fewer pollution. this point in refuted in the lecture a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...or vehicles and create fewer pollution. this point in refuted in the lecture as, inc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less pollution'?
Suggestion: less pollution
...ke more pollution, Hence, the fact that fewer pollution by more farming palm trees, cannot make...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... asserts that, palm oil reduce poverty. this point is, further, called into question...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, regarding, so, therefore, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95859872611 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40797397723 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506369426752 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3320425113 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284988988869 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120488156339 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116133618694 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197114958086 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951586955362 0.0443174109184 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.