Question :Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage
Based on the reading passage, there is a phenomenal called Transient lunar phenomena (TLP) which is shaft like of flash light that comes from the moon's surface. Therefore, keeping this in perspective, the author suggests three assumptions. However, the professor in the lecture cast-doubt on these reasons an, suggesting three points concerning why they seem unconvincing.
The first point mentioned in the reading is, TLP is only random observational errors that caused by observers who use telescope. This point is challenged in the lecture as if it was a pretty random report it must happen on many random palaces. The reading does not take into consideration that these phenomena just take places on two specific area on the Moon. Therefore, this whole point regarding random mistake in observation is refitted in the lecture.
Although it was suggested in the reading that TLP is caused by meteors striking the Moon. this point is rebutted by the lecturer as, the light arising from meteor impacts usually last just one second. Another point mentioned to question the validity of this claim is, the light of TLP las about 20 minutes and light flashes duration a meteor impact never reported. Hence, the fact that is generated from meteors cannot makes sense.
The author in the reading passage asserts that TLP are the result of lunar rocks emitting their own light by a process called thermoluminescence. This point is, further, come into question in the lecture by professor on the grands that this light is weaker than someone can see them. In fact, the reading fails to consider the fact that this lights would not be able to see it is like the candle and spotlight. Thereby, the validity of this claim in the reading is also on question.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'an'?
...the lecture cast-doubt on these reasons an, suggesting three points concerning why ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ervation is refitted in the lecture. Although it was suggested in the reading that TL...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...is caused by meteors striking the Moon. this point is rebutted by the lecturer as, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98299319728 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64028188559 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3534779314 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177506352593 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061692540684 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359648175046 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108932540864 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243251233951 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.