Question :When a new technological device becomes available, some people buy it right away; others wait until many have adopted it. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is generally assumed that purchase new technological devise plays a paramount role to an updated person in society, that having been considered whether is a good treat to buy new technology or not is always having been a much-debated argument. Despite the argument asserting that is a good idea I believe otherwise, maintaining that new technological devices need more development, and no one knows about potential harm could be affected the human body.
First and most obvious, we cannot lose sight of the fact that new electrical devices which are introduced for the first time, might have some disadvantages. Strictly speaking, new things need to be on the hand and used in order to scientist can find out the weak points and solve them on next generation. The best example can fits this argument is first generation of touch cell phones. after years and years, they improved. Therefore, it leaves without saying waiting for new updated is better.
Another equally important point to consider is, the effect of new technological device is unknown to body. In essence, more research of scientist and more updates can find these effects and decrease the risk or even eliminate them. For the purpose of illustration, let's consider the issue of detrimental effect of microwave on body. as a consequence, it goes without saying, be patient for new version might be a good idea.
In the final analysis, although some might contend that purchase new technological device makes you a classy person, I take issue with them and believe this mind-set is nothing but a tunnel-vision that ignore the importance of care about your money and your health. In the grand scheme of things, it behooves people do not rush to buy new electrical devices and wait for better version of next generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: INTRODUCE_FOR_THE_FIRST_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'introduced'.
Suggestion: introduced
...t that new electrical devices which are introduced for the first time, might have some disadvantages. Strictl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'fit'
Suggestion: fit
...n next generation. The best example can fits this argument is first generation of to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... first generation of touch cell phones. after years and years, they improved. Therefo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...etrimental effect of microwave on body. as a consequence, it goes without saying, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01003344482 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79068884085 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578595317726 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7721546808 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.92307692308 5.45110844103 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196279904629 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636173560894 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519245369557 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122106915926 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568286832931 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.