Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is generally assumed that develop many skills make a person more successful, keeping this in perspective, whether someone is be able to learn many skills and use them or not has always been a much-debated argument. Despite this argument asserts that people with different skills are more likely to success, I believe otherwise, maintaining that developing one skill as a maximum ability is more useful and also time saving.
First and most obvious, we cannot lose sight of the fact that, when someone develop one ability in a high level, obviously it is more practical. Strictly speaking, people spend their effort to learn a skill much better anyone else, and it is more likely to get a job which no one can do it. The best example that fits in this argument is, a scholar who work in lab and is able to do experiment that other scientists never can do it is more successful. It leaves no doubt that learned an ability is more practical and useful despite knowing a lot of things but not useful.
Another equally important point to consider is, people spend a lot of time to learn many skills but never could be useful. In essence, spending a great deal of time on several thing without any focusing to reach to a useful ability it's just time wasting. For the purpose of illustration, let's take the example of, a person who spend their whole life to learn many abilities, but none of them help to find a job. It goes without saying learning one perfect ability is more time saving on life.
In the final analysis, although some might contend that learning more skills as much as someone can, is very beneficial, I take issue with them and said this mind set is nothing but a tunnel vision that fail to consider the importance of people live their life just once and life is too short to spend our precious time on many impractical things. In the grand scheme of things, it behooves people find their interest and try to be a master on that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...this in perspective, whether someone is be able to learn many skills and use them ...
^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'develops'.
Suggestion: develops
...se sight of the fact that, when someone develop one ability in a high level, obviously ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'several things'.
Suggestion: several things
...sence, spending a great deal of time on several thing without any focusing to reach to a usef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57264957265 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40924928276 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524216524217 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6126631795 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273939802645 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105490870244 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684168962101 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178796300092 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070634531752 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.