The possibility of making colonization on asteroids.
The passage and the talk both discuss the asteroid colonization instead of the Mars and the Moon. The writer contends that asteriods have several advantages which make them a suitable place to make human civilization. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's assessments. He demonstrates three reasons to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is that asteroids' low gravity make it easier to land and take off for the spacecrafts. In contrast, the professor highlights the fact that low gravity results in certain risks. For example, losing their muscle and bone density due to low gravity, people on asterroids are more subjected to health problems. He further asserts that even in short period of living in such low gravity places, humans confront with serious health conditions.
Second, according to the text, asteroids are a rich source of valuable materials which are scarce on earth and mining them would be extremely profitable; although the speaker finds this idea debatable. He bolsters his opinion by stating that shipping those materials costs a lot. Furthermore, by providing so much valuable materials like gold, it can not be guaranteed that the price of these materials will remain the same, since by purvaying so much materials the cost of them will decrease because of their abundancy.
Lastly, the lecture contradictsthis fallacy of the passage that traveling to asteroids are much convinient because of their short distance from earth, saying that their orbit is strange so that their distance from earth changes over time. Therefore, maybe going there is easier than going to the Mars or Moon, but coming back would be challenging task, since at the time of traveling back to earth, the distance of asteroid may be far away from it's original place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...table place to make human civilization. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... remain the same, since by purvaying so much materials the cost of them will decreas...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, lastly, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12582781457 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6398683438 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596026490066 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5482535621 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.076923077 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0584765303068 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233558719403 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453840659682 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.043726081451 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596220296617 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.