The passage here speaks highly about the benefits of professors who appear on TV to explain current events occuring in their field. But the lecturer in her speech thinks its more disadvantage then advantage.
The article explains that when professors from university appear on TV they become popular as thousands of people watch TV, which is easier than getting noted through publishing paper. But the lecturer refutes saying that it would be considered as bad sign by the fellow professors, they might think that he is not serious and boycott in meetings.
Another way by which the professors talk on TV may benefit is that, it will publicize his university positively which will bring more donation and good applicant in the future. The professor refutes this statement by explaining that the professor wastes his time being on air, in the same time he could teach student or work on his research.
The statement by the passage on public gaining knowledge by this is also disagreed by the professor she says that any person who has done a good amount of research can speak the same. This is because the TV host would not ask complex question as they focus on academic title and too depth would be difficult to be understood by common man.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...her speech thinks its more disadvantage then advantage. The article explains that w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this is also disagreed by the professor she says that any person who has done a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81308411215 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50244007046 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626168224299 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.9464191779 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161247872814 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701428455067 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268497551429 0.0662205650399 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995705434184 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339835500144 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.