professors on television
he reading and the lecture are both about professors appear on television. The author of the reading feels that these television appearances are of great benefit to the professors, to their universities and general public. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that a professors appearances on TV are not beneficial.
To begin with, the author argues that it is good for professors to appear on TV because they can gain good reputation. A lot of viewers will know more about their journals; thus, this makes their importance enhanced. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. She claims the professor appears on TV may not be taken seriously. Hence, people may think this only for entertainment and not an important academy work.
Secondly, the writer suggests that appearing on TV can have a positive feedback on the universities as well. Moreover, this can lead to more donations and more applications from students. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that the professors waste a lot f time in preparing for TV guesting. Additionally, the lecturer says that time should be spend
instead for researching.
Finally, the author posits that professors appear on television, viewers have a chance to learn from expert. Moreover, it is stated in the article that a lot of people do not have the chance to meet the professors; therefore it is a chance to learn from them through television. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that the program is not really for intellectual purposes but it is more of entertainment. In addition, there is no difference when we watch a reporter telling some news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he reading and the lecture are both about ...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'reads'.
Suggestion: reads
he reading and the lecture are both about professo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e professors, to their universities and general public. The lecturer challenges the claims mad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
..., the lecturer says that time should be spend instead for researching. Finally, t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02095487338 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528985507246 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5312773812 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5294117647 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173773768066 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543638895667 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667011517901 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866027707037 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077291713045 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.