the pterosaurs capable of powered flight
The passage discusses a kind of reptile called pterosaurs and makes doubts about its capability to flight for three specific factors as follows:
First, critics dispute that owing to the metabolism this sort of animal is categorized into cold-blooded types. Consequently, it could not fly for the sake of that it has slow blood flow as well as slow motions. Second, researchers argue that pterosaurs were so heavy and as a result of that it failed to fly since it had small and weak wings. Finally, they point out its weak back legs, which could not aid the animal to take off high enough so as to flight.
On the contrary, the lecture cast doubts on the mentioned details. According to the professor, pterosaurs benefited from dens furs to cover its body and as a result, it could be considered as a warm-blooded reptile with a fast metabolism. Next, she mentions to the bone structure of pterosaurs, on the basis of that, it has been noted that it had hollow bones and lightweight despite its enormous frame body. Eventually, all sorts of birds utilize two legs to jump off the ground, however, pterosaurs made use of all four legs and therefore, it had enough power to take off the ground and flight.
All in all, with all the details considered before, this is how the lecture contradicts the reasons in the reading concerning the flight of pterosaurs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... aid the animal to take off high enough so as to flight. On the contrary, the lectu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, as to, kind of, sort of, as a result, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78902953586 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66916242767 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586497890295 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4748123471 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.111111111 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2222222222 7.06452816374 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21845053324 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671956798218 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064020534033 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127324752225 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734289602707 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.