Technology made children less creative than past
Although some critics believe that modern children are less creative in comparison with the past generation owing to modern technology, I am think that, on the contrary, it depicts a new window to the sight of today-generation to thrive their talents more efficient than before.
Regarding the widespread and easy-catch sources of information, all children can fulfill their intends with the aid of state-of-the-art facilities such as the internet as well as social networks. Therefore, when it comes to an inside favorite, there is various means for it. For instance, as a young child dreaming of flying in the clouds, the internet search engines provide fascinating support to find a wide variety of planes and space crafts, which illuminate the mental creation in the child. He or she can consider distinctive aspects of flying and the ways to accomplish it, or even get familiar with the history of flying and the well-known figures in this realm of area. This may flourish the potential insight for a child that in the near future what new approaches will be introduced to the world.
With regards to the high demanding jobs in society, a child has a great chance to figure out the most popular careers in the society. By means of this, it would be likely possible to consider his or her desirable vocation which he or she imagines to take in the upcoming future. As a consequence of that, enthusiastic children understand their capabilities and importantly, enhance their talents and creativity on the basis of their desired job. As a case in point, a child who wants to be a painter in the future, tries to participate in art festivals more, or for someone who is eager in engineering, mathematics or physics would be more interesting and the spot of the attention. Therefore children not only are able to consider their needs and thrive their abilities but they can more creative be prosperous in the future.
All in all, today’s technology plays a key role in booming silent potentials and creativity in children by providing them beneficial sources of information as well as introducing various careers in their society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...ration owing to modern technology, I am think that, on the contrary, it depicts a new...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are various means'?
Suggestion: there are various means
...e, when it comes to an inside favorite, there is various means for it. For instance, as a young child ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 239, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagines taking'.
Suggestion: imagines taking
... her desirable vocation which he or she imagines to take in the upcoming future. As a consequenc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 684, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...eresting and the spot of the attention. Therefore children not only are able to consider ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01675977654 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93808145719 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3465478421 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.666666667 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 20.6045352989 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148910218004 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471733171506 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657792527291 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105297157871 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702307228862 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.