Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
There has been an approach that learning skills facilitates the daily routine and brings about a convenient life, on the contrary, some individuals contend that specializing in a certain skill is way more crucial. I wholeheartedly agree with this statement that improving varied skills will inevitably result in success compared to people who concentrate only on a specific skill. This essay will enlarge upon the benefits of learning different skills and glance over the side of the argument as well.
To commence with, the working place has always been a rivalry environment, correspondingly, the staff does their best to get promotions and to receive more money. What is more, the highly skilled people concerning different subjects tend to be more successful compared to ordinary individuals. An ample example of this situation would be the renowned bodybuilder and actor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who earned millions of dollars in the terminator series. Accordingly, he engaged in acting rehearses and entered the world of movies, even he admitted that if he remained only in the bodybuilding arena and did not develop his skills, he would not have earned this wealth.
Moreover, science and technology are advancing at a tremendous pace in this day and age. Meanwhile, staying focused on an individual subject does not guarantee a breakthrough in the development of patents and promising technologies and therefore the role of interdisciplinary research reflects its utmost prominence here. A salient example of this situation would be the production of the COVID-19 vaccines in this pandemic era as scientists who are familiar with bioinformatics approaches have a high chance to come up with new solutions regarding the development of vaccines compared to traditional pharmacists who only rely on experimental procedures.
Turning to the other side of the argument, although the promotion of numerous skills is helpful to reach success, sometimes staying focused on a specific type of skill enables success. To illustrate, the well-known electric guitar player Joe Satriani spent most precious times of his youth concentrating on playing his electric guitar, recording tracks, and playing live concerts due to his passion for this musical instrument. He told the social media that if I did allocate my time to other activities I would have got to this place which I am right now.
By and large, the advancement in several skills is necessary to be more successful in several aspects of our lives, nonetheless, some people argue that the professions have advanced in a great way that one cannot develop several skills and need to be focused on one certain subject. Herein, I reiterate my opinion that by participating in learning different skills, there would be a higher chance to reach success and be proud owing to the aforementioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o only rely on experimental procedures. Turning to the other side of the argumen...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great way" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rgue that the professions have advanced in a great way that one cannot develop several skills ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ud owing to the aforementioned reasons.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, by and large, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 30.3222958057 214% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 1373.03311258 175% => OK
No of words: 454.0 270.72406181 168% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29074889868 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.04702891845 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07512968783 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 145.348785872 173% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555066079295 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 419.366225166 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9523276421 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.133333333 110.228320801 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2666666667 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300843580059 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989561272651 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100380519392 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16615333603 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764087560881 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.3589403974 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 63.6247240618 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.