Rambrandt painting
Both text deal with the question weather or not the painting "Portrait of an Elderly Women in a White Bonnet" was painted by the most famous Dutch painter Rembrandt. The text clearly states, that many facts .prove that it wasn't painted by Rembrabdt himself, but just attributed to him because of his style. In the lecture howeve rthe professor gives proof why it is in fact a work of the famous Dutch painter.
In the reading, the author begins by stating that the fur collar in the painting does not match clothing typical of a servant womean, a detail that Rambrandt would not have overlooked. The lecture, however disagrees with this viewpoint. Hs states that the fur collar was added later in an attempt to increase the painting's value.
The author also claims that the light and shadow appear incorrectly in the painting, but Rambrandt was a master of painting light and shadow. Again, the lecture believes there are flaws in the writer's argument. The speaker holds that the light and shadow appeared incorrectly because of the fur collar that was added later. Once the fur collar was removed, the light and shadow appeared correctly.
Another reason why the author feels is that the portrait was painted on multiple wood panels, which was not typical of Rembrandt's works. The professor in the listening passage is doubtful that is accurate , he suggested that the original was painted on a single wood panel. Additional wood panels were added to the painting later in an attempt to increase its value. In addition the professor stated that the panel wood is as same as were used by Rambrandt in his other paintings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: ASK_WETHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whether'?
Suggestion: whether
Both text deal with the question weather or not the painting 'Portrait of a...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: Woman
...e painting 'Portrait of an Elderly Women in a White Bonnet' was painted by ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...The text clearly states, that many facts .prove that it wasnt painted by Rembrabdt...
^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... states, that many facts .prove that it wasnt painted by Rembrabdt himself, but just ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...lecture believes there are flaws in the writers argument. The speaker holds that the li...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing passage is doubtful that is accurate , he suggested that the original was pain...
^^
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...in an attempt to increase its value. In addition the professor stated that the panel woo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89928057554 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.494252846 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514388489209 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6555955676 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294746141499 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957863798063 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834804590633 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180008497779 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496433833283 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.