READING
From the reading, many critics argue that Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as core and sugar cane, is not a good alternative for gasoline. On the contrary, the speaker strongly believe Ethanol fuel do be a good replacement.
Firstly, the reading states that the biggest environmental problem: global warming, cannot be solve by the increased use of ethanol fuel. The professor admits the use of ethanol fuel will add carbon dioxide. However, carbon dioxide is part of the nutrient of the processing ethanol. Therefore, growing ethanol can remove carbon dioxide from the air.
Secondly, the author suggests that the amount of plants available for uses other fuel would decrease resulting from the production of significant amount of ethanol. The professor, however, since the ethanol can generate on kind of edible food for animals, the amount of available food is unlikely to reduce.
Finally, for the point of the price, the lecturer contends that it is certainly cheap for the ethanol fuel by the government’s tax subsidies, but the benefit will not be always be wanted. Because the increasing production of products will lead to the decline of the price. Therefore, since the less use of gasoline, the rising demands of ethanol fuel contributes to the price going down. On the other hand, the reading points out that ethanol fuel will not be able to compete with gasoline on price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e benefit will not be always be wanted. Because the increasing production of products w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, kind of, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 22.412803532 27% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07826086957 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65523700522 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534782608696 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1105981658 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0664913800651 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317011871609 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708995670884 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0403346344962 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407919861399 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.