Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Teachers play a significant role in students’ education. Typically, teachers are supposed to access their students performance in school. On the contrary, students should also evaluate their teachers and their teaching methods in order to give the feedback to teachers, to better meet the studying demands of students .
As teachers, they are also eager to know the courses’ feedback. Asking students to evaluate their teacher is one of best way to obtain feedback. According to students’ comment, teachers are able to get informed whether or not their performance helpful and efficient. For example, my math teacher requires us to make some comment about his class at the end of each semester. Because of no certain name on the comment paper, we honestly and truly write down what we think about the math course. In fact, our elevation usually help my math teacher adjust to teaching methods and improve the quality of course.
Mostly important, through our elevation, teachers can know our students’ demands and therefore try their best to satisfy students requirements. As a matter of fact, if our students studying demands are greatly met, we would boost our study interest and efficiency. As a result, students can make better and obvious progress with study. For instance, last semester, our math teacher assigned too much homework to us. What’s worse, he did not ask us to summit these homework so that we did not know whether we were right or wrong. In my view, this kind of homework just wasted our time. Thus, our elevation included this one and finally our math teacher did not give us this assignment this semester. Consequently, it is unnecessary to waste our time and we have more time to do other homework.
In a word, the elevation from students contributes to apparent results. Both teachers and students are beneficial from it. Therefore, I strongly agree that school should ask students to access their teachers.

Votes
Average: 3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...er meet the studying demands of students . As teachers, they are also eager to kn...
^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...udents to evaluate their teacher is one of best way to obtain feedback. According to st...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ment, teachers are able to get informed whether or not their performance helpful and efficient...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this homework' or 'these homeworks'?
Suggestion: this homework; these homeworks
...os;s worse, he did not ask us to summit these homework so that we did not know whether we were...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, honestly, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, of course, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my view, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.146875 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80606687659 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540625 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4316203727 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.35 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170866242429 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686712163834 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899837779731 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150325944801 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825735790707 0.0645574589148 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.