The reading and the lecture discuss whether humans can coexist with bears and what to do in case of an attack
The reading and the lecture discuss whether humans can coexist with bears and what to do in case of an attack. The professor casts doubt on the information provided in the reading passage by giving examples and explanations that directly contradict it.
Fistly, the lecturer argues that bears are more likely to attack humans when they do not fear them. Bears lose their fear towards humans when they are fed by them. In contrast, the lecturer gives two examples in which he denies this idea. In Minnesota and Pennsylvania bears coexist with humans, and there are still no attacks registered.
Secondly, the author from the passage describes few signs that a bear gives before it is ready to attack. When a bear huffs, or growls, or stands in both of his legs, it means it is about to attack. Conversely, the lecturer denies these are signs of attacking. Instead, he claims, for example, that when a bear stands on both of his feet, or displays some slapping or salivating, it is warning humans to walk away.
Lastly, the speaker casts doubt on information on how should humans behave if a bear attacks them. The reading says that you should run as fast as you can, climb up a tree or try to shoot the bear that attacks you. The lecturer disproves these tree methods by explaining that you cant run away from a bear because it is faster than humans, climbing a tree is not a good idea because bears are good climbers as well. He suggests that in case of an attack, humans should go on the ground and cover their head and neck with their hands. Humans can also try to raise their arms in the air, so bears can see that they are larger animals. The last option is to fake death or use pepper spray.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 280, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ese tree methods by explaining that you cant run away from a bear because it is fast...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52103559871 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27491747676 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504854368932 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8797906209 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3125 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 4.45695364238 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480692146462 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162000815613 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224986166152 0.0662205650399 340% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321406022304 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184807548658 0.0443174109184 417% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 53.8541721854 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.2367328918 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.