reasons about an asteroid could be the best colonization option
The reading passage presents three reasons about an asteroid could be the best colonization option, but the lecturer poses some evidences against these unpractical reasons in the reading.
To begin with, the reading purposes the first reason that the low gravity of asteroid can help us land safer, carry more equipment or use less fuel to take off than other planet or moon. However, the lecturer explains that what the low gravity brings to us are not just the benefits but a health problem for people who lives here, because we will loss the mass of muscle or the density of bone with low gravity, which needs to be a long time recovery.
Furthermore, the reading highlights the second reason that it is profitable for some sponsor to explore the asteroid because of the good source of rare and precious materials. But the lecturer argues that the cost of mining minerals or sending them back to earth is much more expensive than the profit of selling those rare and precious materials. Besides, if the production of those rare minerals will increase dramatically, and thus the price of those materials could reduce too.
Finally, the third reason is said in the reading that it is much easier to reach an asteroid than other planet like Mars. It is contrary to point out in the lecture that it could be much more difficult to go back Earth when asteroid leaves the closest point between the orbit and Earth, because it may be more far away from earth than Mars. Therefore, it could be a great challenge under this circumstance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-14 | prem1234 | 71 | view |
| 2018-07-27 | Springlovers | 80 | view |
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 60
- we should be optimistic when we fail. 66
- money reward cannot be the best way to encourage the children. 70
- it could be more important to read or watch news about opposite opinions rather than similar opinions 56
- test 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...However, the lecturer explains that what the low gravity brings to us are not jus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74906367041 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40243415769 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558052434457 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4528338208 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.888888889 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2222222222 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325842095578 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132725049722 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157531075238 0.0662205650399 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225977158964 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20084561826 0.0443174109184 453% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.