In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, frogs help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. Several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog populations.
First, frogs are being harmed by pesticides, which are chemicals used to prevent insects from damaging farm crops such as corn and sugarcane. Pesticides often spread from farmland into neighboring frog habitats. Once pesticides enter a frog’s body, they attack the nervous system, leading to severe breathing problems. If laws prohibited the farmers from using harmful pesticides near sensitive frog populations, it would significantly reduce the harm pesticides cause to frogs.
A second major factor in frog population decline is a fungus that has spread around the world with deadly effect. The fungus causes thickening of the skin, and since frogs use their skin to absorb water, infected frogs die of dehydration. Recently, researchers have discovered several ways to treat or prevent infection, including antifungal medication and treatments that kill the fungus with heat. Those treatments, if applied on a large scale, would protect sensitive frog populations from infection.
Third, in a great many cases, frog populations are in decline simply because their natural habitats are threatened. Since most frog species lay their eggs in water, they are dependent on water and wetland habitats. Many such habitats are threatened by human activities, including excessive water use or the draining of wetlands to make them suitable for development. If key water habitats such as lakes and marshes were better protected from excessive water use and development, many frog species would recover.
The author in the passage states that many frog species around the world have declined and gone extinct due to changes in their environment and the author also proveides three method to protect the frogs. However, the professor in the lecture says that none of the methods is practical and challenges each of the methods those are given by the author.
First, the reading claims that as the frongs are declining due to the pestiecides, which are used in the farm land, limitation on the using pesticide will be a method to solve the problem. Notwithstanding, the professor in the lecture refutes this point by saying that this is not economically feasible. If the governments give regulations regarding the use of pesticides, then the farmers will not able to use their required amount of chemicals to the farm. Therefore, they will not get the proper yeild from their farmland. As a result, there is a possibility to have a loss on agriculture, so the method is not applicable.
Second, the passage posits that another major factor of declining frog population is due to the fungus infectin, so treatment to eliminate these fungus is another method to inhibit the declination. On the contrary, the professor repudiates this method also and tells that there are several problem and complexities regarding he method. According to the professor, for the treatment of the fungul infection, we need to consider every individual frogs, which is a tough job. Moreover, the offsrping may carry the infection, so we need to give treatment to each of the offspring, which is a complex procedure.
Third, the article mentions that frogs are dicling because of destruction of their habitat, so recovering of thier habitat is the another method of solution. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this sotion too and says that frogs are actually declining due to global warming, not for the habitat limitaion. The professor explains that many wet land animals are declining because of global warming, so frogs is also declining for this reason. As a result, providing he sufficient habitat for the frog will not help us to stop the frog declination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fungus' or 'these fungi', 'these funguses'?
Suggestion: this fungus; these fungi; these funguses
...gus infectin, so treatment to eliminate these fungus is another method to inhibit the declin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'several problems'.
Suggestion: several problems
...is method also and tells that there are several problem and complexities regarding he method. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
...d also and tells that there are several problem and complexities regarding he method. A...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bitat, so recovering of thier habitat is the another method of solution. Neverthe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, third, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 355.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03943661972 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8284215139 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478873239437 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0429373572 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.266666667 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266760113334 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868512715766 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953744572745 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159903412002 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740374756101 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.