red rain in Kerala
The reading passage suggests three rational explanations for the red rain phenomenon in Kerala region. However, the lecture contradicts these explanations stating that it is absurd.
First of all, the argument that the blood of bats caused the red rain makes no sense at all. Because the myriad of bats destroyed at the exact same time is simply impossible. Even if there was a thunderstorm or meteor burst, over 500 millions bats can not be dead simultaneously. Moreover, there was no evidence of bats’ wings or feet which explains the absence of destruction.
Second, the theory of a volcanic eruption in the Philippines is disproven with the fact that it turns out that the red rain is only found in Kerala, but nowhere else. None of the countries near India, including the Philippines as known as the origin of a volcanic eruption responsible for the red rain, have experienced the red rain phenomenon.
Finally, the reading passage states the red rain results in the chemical pollution from local factories, and this is absolutely not true. The lecture contradicts it since there are few factories in that area which are not enough to make pollutants to convince the phenomenon to occur. Furthermore, if factories are the cause of this red rain, cities near the factories should experience this phenomenon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sed the red rain makes no sense at all. Because the myriad of bats destroyed at the exa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07798165138 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84537183813 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1751405501 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.636363636 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413514657349 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143594464565 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143624817632 0.0662205650399 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246564138529 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125880227592 0.0443174109184 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.