Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believed that reading a book or seeing a movie more than once is boring despite its good quality. However, as a person who read a classical book repeatedly and watch the same movie all the time, I guarantee you can get more interesting feelings when you read a good book or see a good movie the second time.
The second time gives you a chance to comprehend profound meaning in the narratives. There should be a time difference between the first time you and the second time you read or saw. During this gap, random experiences that happen to be fertile soil in your life are piled up. And because of these experiences, your initial perspective of the narratives would change in a better way. For example, I would like to share my experience for the second time I read “1984” written by George Orwell. I read that book for the first time when I was a teenager. In the present point of a view, at that time I did not understand what the actual meaning of the lines in the book. However, while growing up I encounter ‘the world’ that stirring up many issues and struggle under the fact that the society has an invisible power like money, fame, or authority, I was either sometimes a part of the struggle or an observer. ‘Big brother’ in the “1984” is fictional but getting real to me. Since then, I am able to figure out an exact lesson the author wanted to talk about to readers.
Furthermore, people cannot catch many details in the narratives of text and video at once. When you focus on another aspect at the second time, you can see tremendously various things that you’ve never known before. When the “Parasite” by Bong joon ho came out, I watched twice. The second time was few days after first seeing which means the benefit of piling life experiences due to the time matter that I mentioned earlier is not working here, though, you still can enjoy the movie by exploring details in the scenes. For the second time seeing that film, I tried to find the connection between places where the characters live -Basement, Semi-basement, and the big house with second floors-and hierarchy within the characters. This was such an interesting way to enjoy the movie and it made a good movie to be much better.
To sum up, a good movie and a good book is still good whether you experience for the first time or the second time. Also it is even more interesting at the second time phase, since you look closely and interpret in a new way with your experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...between places where the characters live -Basement, Semi-basement, and the big ho...
^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... for the first time or the second time. Also it is even more interesting at the seco...
^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e, since you look closely and interpret in a new way with your experiences.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, still, then, well, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.578125 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53406223692 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511160714286 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.846513107 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.55 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378020236021 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117871790094 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111503562364 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292057810477 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104899319122 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.