Rembrandt
The summary of the points made in the lecture is as follows;
The panel of the experts stated that, the original painting did not have the fur collar and it was added afterward by other person, maybe to increase the value of the painting. This shows that the original painting was indeed a painting from Rembrandt and was tempered with almost after a period of 100 years.
Also, the face is shown illuminated with a light from below, it is because the original painting had a white collar. This was determined after the fur colour pigments were removed. So as the collar was white in colour ,it would reflect the light from below instead of absorbing the light. Thus, the master of painting light and shadow did his best while painting it and it is indeed a painting of Rembrandt.
And finally, the issue of wooden board of the back of the painting, there was a single piece in the original painting. And then new extensions were added afterwards, probably by the same person as the one who added fur to the painting with the same reason, to increase the value of the painting.
Due to all these alterations made by other people the current painting looks different from paintings made by Rembrandt. And the panel came to conclusion that the painting is indeed a painting of Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: white
...ents were removed. So as the collar was white in colour ,it would reflect the light from below ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed. So as the collar was white in colour ,it would reflect the light from below in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, may, so, then, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42208533785 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.193181315 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1388556744 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731866470789 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923847733493 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830310583579 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870470679594 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 63.6247240618 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.