In this set of materials, the reading passage states three main doubts about the Rembrandts painting known as 'Portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet'. He was the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, the professor refutes all the doubts made in the article, and his reasons are as follows.
To start with, the passage points out about doubts about painting that the lady wearing white linen cap that servants wore and the luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. Nevertheless, the lecturer denis this doubt as she explains that fur colour was painted over the original colour after 100 years after the painting was made, to make it look fresh.
Secondly, the reading contends that Rembrandt was master of painting light and shadow but in that particular painting there is an illumination of light from below and dark fur collar that would absorb the light. Nevertheless, the professor argues that when fur was painted with colour over the original fur colour, the face had appeared to be in partial shadow.
Last, the article states that back of the painting was made on several pieces of wood glued together. But it has been said that Rembrandt often paints on single wood panels. Conversely, the professor defends this doubt by providing a piece of information done by a researcher on the wood of that painting. Extra pieces were added to the back of painting during the fur colouring process. She also makes it clear by saying that the painting was made on the same wood panel used by Rembrandt to make another painting.
In sum, the professor cast a reasonable solution on the doubts made by people about the painting by Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her. But it has been said that Rembrandt often paints on single wood panels. Conv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91958041958 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56463466613 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8186148334 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.230769231 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293672698156 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121232996839 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629776764982 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185159726977 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538165526269 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.