Rembrandt Painting
The author believes that, the painting of the woman with white bonnet could not be one of the Rembrandt's art works. Supporting his opinion, he provides some reasons. The lecturer, however, rejects the arguments as follows.
To begin with, the author of the reading passage states that the inconsistency of the woman's dresse with her bonnet that was special for the servents at that era, could not be attributed to Rembrandt who was famuse for his attention to the details of his subjects. This, however, is rebutted by the professor, arguing that the fur collar is added to the original painting by some other painter about one hundred years after the painting was made, in order to make it look more valuable. This point is clearly in direct contradiction to what the reading passage mentioned about the inconsistency in the details.
In addition, unlike the writer who maintains that in this painting the light and shadow do not fit together, the lecturer is of the opinion that X-ray examination demonstrated that the original dresse of the model had a bright colour that could reflect the light properly that illuminated the low part of the woman's face. Therefore, in the original painting, light and shadow was enough realistic and accurate. This is also in sharp contrast to the reading's reasoning about invalid lighting in the forenamed painting.
Finally, while the author asserts that the painting was made on a several pieces wooden panel, the professor refutes this claim and points out that the original painting was made on a small single wood. This panel, however, enlarge by the other persons to increase the size and the worthiness of the art work. Moreover, the examinations illustrate that the original panel was from the same tree of one of the other Rembrandt's painting panel: his self-portrait. Again, this is yet another blow to the integrity of the argument put forth by the author of the reading passage.
For these reasons, the lecture dismisses the author's arguments as unconvincing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0328358209 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64290220329 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516417910448 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6166666301 49.2860985944 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224469055139 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693795665176 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950800785389 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122574526988 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832166903768 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.