Repenomamus robustus (R.robustus) was not an active hunter
The writing introduces an debate whether Rempenomamus is robustus was a hunter of dinosaurs or not. The writer says that it was likely a scavenger that occasionally fed on dinosaur eggs consisting unhatched dinosaurs. The lecturer disagrees. She says that Repenomamus can potentially be the dinosaur.
First, the author says that R.robustus was too small to feed on dinosaurs - similar to a cat in size. The reading passage states, as size difference between R.robustus and psittacosaurs is too huge, therefore R.robustus would not be able to hunt down psittacosaurs or similar dinosaurs. The professor believes there are flaws in the author's position. She contends that it may be too small to hunt a fully grown dinosaur, but it can surely hunt down baby dinosaurs. She goes on to say that that many pray's are almost as big as twice in size compared to the their hunters, therefore it can be the case in this scenario as well.
According to the writer size and positioning of R.robustus's legs are not suited for hunting due to their small size and positioned below the body which reduces its speed required for hunting dinosaurs. The speaker, on the other hand, points out that modern mammal- Tasmenian Devil has the similar leg positioning and size; it can achieve speed fast anough to catch a pray. He feels that this can be the case with R.robustus as well.
Also, the reading passage notes how, there are teeth marks present on the hunted animal's body when inside the stomach, due to getting eaten by the hunter. As these teeth marks are not present in the specimen found inside R.robustus, hence it possibly did not hunt the dinosaur. The professor rebuts this argument by stating that reaading overlooks an important factor. She goes on to say that R.robustus does not use teeth to swallow teeth for pray and swallows it as a whole. She says, there is evidence to this as hind teeth of Rrobustus are not worn out.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
The writing introduces an debate whether Rempenomamus is robustus...
^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r that occasionally fed on dinosaur eggs consisting unhatched dinosaurs. The lect...
^^
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r eggs consisting unhatched dinosaurs. The lecturer disagrees. She says that Repen...
^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...down baby dinosaurs. She goes on to say that that many prays are almost as big as twice i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ost as big as twice in size compared to the their hunters, therefore it can be the case i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82779456193 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62604312269 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519637462236 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6159666164 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212702047593 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735148755838 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922143441517 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138280706927 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756436313604 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
The writing introduces an debate whether Rempenomamus is robustus...
^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r that occasionally fed on dinosaur eggs consisting unhatched dinosaurs. The lect...
^^
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r eggs consisting unhatched dinosaurs. The lecturer disagrees. She says that Repen...
^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...down baby dinosaurs. She goes on to say that that many prays are almost as big as twice i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ost as big as twice in size compared to the their hunters, therefore it can be the case i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82779456193 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62604312269 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519637462236 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6159666164 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212702047593 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735148755838 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922143441517 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138280706927 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756436313604 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.