Both the passage and the lecture are about the graded school systems of learning. While the author of the text explains about what the graded learning system is and how it structures students based on their chronological age. The lecturer, however, points out the problems associated with the graded system of schooling.
As per the text, the schooling typically starts in the first grade and educates the children through twelve successive grades. Professor points out that since first grade starts at the age of six for most students in the graded system, it doesn't take into account the academic readiness of the child. He believes that a child may not be ready physically, socially and mentally to start schooling at that young age. Additionally, most of the children may still be physically and socially immature by the time they complete twelve successful grades of schooling.
Secondly, the reading pushes forth the fact that the students who do not qualify the eligibility criteria for promotion into next grade are asked to repeat the same grade for another year. Professor contends that the promotion system has fallacies and need to be reviewed. It doesn't deal with actual learning of the students. Moreover, the failed students need to repeat the same course completely for another year which may feel boring to them. This, he posits, may lead to high dropout rates. Furthermore, he argues that this system makes the weak students to study the whole syllabus again and makes the strong ones to wait for the next grade's classes.
To summarize, the professor successfully lists the serious shortcomings involved with the graded method of education as it doesn't deal with the actual learning of the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... most students in the graded system, it doesnt take into account the academic readines...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s fallacies and need to be reviewed. It doesnt deal with actual learning of the studen...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...th the graded method of education as it doesnt deal with the actual learning of the st...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10247349823 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55676114583 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540636042403 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7129434901 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.142857143 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0549818870828 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0271026137641 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524991858492 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0348976335273 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355996687553 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.