set 1
The reading is about the Altruism behavior in which human and mammal can share their own properties without receiving advantages. The lecture argues the idea with the writer.
To begin with, the writer states that the meekeart are looking for the food and watching the other predators when they perform as standing guard. Moreover, they made an voice when the predator come, by doing this, the other member of their group can ran away and save their place and it can have danger to standing guest. The professor claimed that it is mostly close in the recent experiment. On top of this, the meekart eat the food before they act as standing guest and when the other animals approach to their group, they go into the burrow and make an alarm. As a result, the other markeet more increase and together in one place, so the survival rate may be increased.
Secondly, the reading passage describes as the human have ability of unselfish and share not only food but also organ if other need as necessary. At a consequence, the human being can proud even if they don't get reward. On the other hand, the professor argues that people can make donation of organs to their family or other person even if they don't posses any appreciation form the person who accepted theirs because they value the non - benefit reward.
To sum up, the reading passage and the lecturer states their opinion differently for Altruism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m as standing guard. Moreover, they made an voice when the predator come, by doin...
^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...as standing guard. Moreover, they made an voice when the predator come, by doing ...
^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the human being can proud even if they dont get reward. On the other hand, the prof...
^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eir family or other person even if they dont posses any appreciation form the person...
^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...en if they dont posses any appreciation form the person who accepted theirs because ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74285714286 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27617594481 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7261755372 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.636363636 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.