smoking
The article states that public smoking causes health risks and provide reasons of support. The professor explains that she is disagree with freedom and refers each of the author's reasons. First, the reading claims that some health problems occur because of secondhand smoke. However, the professor refutes this point by explaining that smokers do not do it home. She states that government can take action about clean environment and air protected. Second, the article posits that smoking ban affects the freedoms and economic positions of business owners and bar and restaurant have had shut down. The professor saying that city and bar new one open and thrives. According to the professor, Smoking at home avoiding and make clear air. Third, the reading says that smokers pay higher tax. The professor opposes that lung cancer and heart diseases this point by explaining that smoking create health disease of lunge cancer and heart disease
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ort. The professor explains that she is disagree with freedom and refers each of the aut...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 791, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ading says that smokers pay higher tax. The professor opposes that lung cancer a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 30.3222958057 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 1373.03311258 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 152.0 270.72406181 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19736842105 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28277149675 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638157894737 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 419.366225166 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0315968007 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25900879461 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100414908655 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105026136442 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25900879461 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.