Solar Energy
The lecture adds upon the benefits already stated in the passage. Professor also concerns himself with the multi-faceted use of solar energy, while having a critical take on whether offset production of solar energy is worth considering it as an alternative to non-renewable energy sources.
Firstly, the passage states that solar energy provides a viable alternative to fossil fuel, and while the professor does not contradict the statement, he does point to the reality, that is solar cells are produced with the non- renewable energies. However, the professor does point out that the energy used to produce solar cell is recovered thanks to the life span of solar cell. Thus energy produced over the course of its lifetime is greater than the non-renewable energy used to produce it.
Secondly, the lecturer points to the mutiple uses of solar energy which results in energy optimization. While byproducts of fossil fuels can be harmful to the environment, the byproducts of solar energy can be further used. For example, the heat from the sun can be used as a heater for domestic use.
And lastly, the lecturer looks at the financial benefits of using solar energy. Solar can be used for a variety of purposes leading to a reduced cost. The passage does point to its one-time installation thus meaning that it will not gain additional expenses with time, while at the same time the tax incentives provided by the governments ensure that investing in solar energy would be a frugal venture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... thanks to the life span of solar cell. Thus energy produced over the course of its ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06024096386 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68789033248 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538152610442 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5344818804 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.545454545 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481298839989 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214284696958 0.0996497079465 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143341885153 0.0662205650399 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329739040525 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526506870444 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.