Some people believe that success in creative fields, such as painting, fiction writing, and
filmmaking, primarily requires hard work and perseverance. Others believe that such
success mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own
position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Creative fields can be a awe-inspiring while concurrently frustrating topic. That is we can feel humbled by the beauty of an artwork while at the same time get bambozeled at how a human being is able to produce such a work. This inability of a quotidian to comprehend the construction of a creative work is what has led many to believe that some abilities are simply inborn and cannot to attained. But is such really the case?
The fact that some people have an in born talent for certain activities cannot be questioned. From a very tender age Lionel Messi can dribble past five to ten players with ease. I am sure many of us also saw one of our classmate produce a very intricate drawing, while our own may look pastoral. And I am sure many of those talented people turned out to be great artist. So there can be no denying that talent helps. It but is not a defining factor. Among those same group of people who produced great art at a young age, some did not get to become a great artist. And why is that? It is due to the absence of hardwork. Sure you may have a talent for a certain skill but if you do not hone it, you will evetually find that your skill is not impressive enough anymore. The fastidousness of your creative work would be lost due to your complacency.
One also cannot ignore the other group of people. There are many out there who never were good at music or art, but suddenly a few years later they are producing masterpieces. Now how is that happening? It is because there perseverance has led them to attain skills that they did not have before. After thorough practice of such skill, one can be able to produce a piece of art that may have been beyond even his imagination.
Some people are inclined to argue there failure in certain category because of their lack of innate skill in such category. But that is more due to the fact that they did not persevere enough to attain the skills required. Sure it may be more difficult more some to attain a certain skill, but it is possible to attain them.
Overall, talent definitely helps but it is not the defining factor. Talented people may loose their skills through complacency while normal people may be able to attain the skills through perseverence. Only through hard and thorough work does some reach mastery skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
Creative fields can be a awe-inspiring while concurrently frustr...
^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[10]
Message: The pronoun is must be used with 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...le concurrently frustrating topic. That is we can feel humbled by the beauty of an...
^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun out seems to be countable; consider using: 'many outs'.
Suggestion: many outs
...re the other group of people. There are many out there who never were good at music or a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 89, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...he defining factor. Talented people may loose their skills through complacency while ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, really, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52142857143 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46811296999 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480952380952 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.691686768 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0384615385 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1538461538 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.65384615385 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17451455308 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482836180396 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044992048737 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101242109273 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378084520073 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 14.1392134831 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.