Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational Institutions have a responsibility to train students so that they can face the complexities and quandries of adult life to the best of their ability. So at first glance one is inclined to think that students should be protected from pursuing fields that may lead them to have a difficult adult life. But is the situation really that simple?
Educational institutions play a huge role in developing and shaping students, so it is also within their responsibility to understand a students strengths and weakness and thus encourage students to take the path most suitable for each individual. However, this is clearly a very idealistic claim. For starters once you start to forcibly guide a student to certain path, juvenile minds have a tendency to rebel. The hippie culture of the 1970s was born as a result of the rebellion against the strict rigid and well mannered culture that their parents enforced on them. So dissuading a student from a certain field might lead them to pursue it instead.
Then of course their is the connundrum of how do you know your student. The behavior or the insterests they exhibit infront of educational institution may not be a true representative of their actual characteristics. It is quiet known that people change their behaviors to carter to the needs of their immediate milieu, and students are more prone to that.
No people can claim that they are the same person that they were as a child. People’s characteristics behaviors and interests all change from their tender age. So how are instituitions to know that the field of study that is a weak point today may end up being their strong point tomorrow. And in retrospect students should never be dissuaded from challenging their weak points, as doing as such will help them grow and mature as a human being.
Protecting our juveniles from suffering is among the fundamental driving force of human race. So it is understandable that we would not want students to suffer by ensure that they do not choose a field that would lead to them having a difficult life. However, it is very difficult to know which path would lead to such a scenario, and very difficult to implement even if it was possible. So educational institution should not prevent students from pursueing their weak fields, rather they should preapare them for all scenarios so that students could handle a difficult situation with the least amount of difficulty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...to pursue it instead. Then of course their is the connundrum of how do you know yo...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al driving force of human race. So it is understandable that we would not want st...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, so, then, thus, well, of course, you know, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95133819951 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87062762423 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513381995134 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1407997525 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.105263158 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6315789474 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234260501985 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698497226827 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461861631492 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130826558047 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352334548488 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.