Solutions to prevent injuries of glass to birds
Based on the seemingly reasonable evidence, the reading insists that there might be three solutions that can prevent birds from flying into buildings which uses glass as a building material. However, the professor strongly disapproves of the above and then presents several pieces of evidence to support his idea.
First, the reading contends that if the normal glass is replaced by one-way glass, which is transparent only on one side, then it can stop birds from bumping into it. Yet, the professor refutes this conclusion, demonstrating that because of the nontransparent side which reflects like a mirror, so this makes it an ineffective way.
Moreover, the reading attempts to inform that painting the glass with colors may have the chance of dealing with the issue. The professor, however, suggests that though some parts of the glass are painted, the remaining parts are still transparent. Unless the glass is painted dense, though it can be hard for people to look outside.
At last, the reading assumes that an artificial magnetic field can be created to guide the birds' paths. But one critical fact is neglected. pointed out by the professor, although birds have a natural ability to navigate their way, it will only function when they need to migrate for a long distance. On the contrary, only their eyes and the sense of light are used for short distances.
In conclusion, it seems that the reading and the lecture are both about solutions to prohibit injuries to birds, the three main points made in the passage are adequately challenged by the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pointed
...hs. But one critical fact is neglected. pointed out by the professor, although birds ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... adequately challenged by the lecturer.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, then, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05363984674 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58494363925 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60153256705 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.025958859 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.916666667 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251251023632 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700201112879 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071859043316 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118795682166 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434315849896 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.