Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
As the population is growing all around the world, people are using more food, drinks, which produces millions of tons of trash which is not only harmful to the environment, but associated with human health risks. Now may some people think not enough of recyclable waste is recycled by householders, for which they assert that the government is responsible and the problem will be tackled only by establishing restrict rules for citizens. Personally, I believe that legal enforcement is not the only method to employ; instructing people is needed as well.
Consumers definitely need regulations in order to co-operate in the recycling chain. In other words, people play an important role in cleanup efforts and if they do not be governed by law, most of them would see no need to put their waste in separate trash receptacles. More specifically, when consumers use for instance bottles, they rather put it in the same trash bin with their wasted food, because it's more convenient; worse, they grab it in nature and say: the city will sort it out!. Thus, they must taste the authority of government by tax-paying or other instructions. But, as Rob Kaplan- an investor- told National Geographic: "there is no silver bullet to stop plastic pollution". To put it in other words, governments cannot eliminate whole recyclable wastes just by formulating rules; every single person's cooperation is needed on this planet. Citizen's lifestyle must be changed towards classifying waste fractions. And in order to do so, people also need education.
Indeed, most people want to cooperate with waste collection services, but they do not know how exactly they can separate recyclable wastes. Consequently, a high percentage of the population just rather put all trash in one blue bin!. Therefore, governments need to ensure we citizens are aware and disciplined. To illustrate, in developed countries like Finland and Sweden, not only children learn about waste collection in school times, but also government does powerful funding projects to make people full-aware of the way of collecting and separating their waste, And one can see how those countries are successful in recycling management compared to developing countries like Iran in which most people even do not know what recyclable waste is.
To sum up, in order to increase the rate of recyclable waste collection by people, not only governments need to apply the special rule on citizens, but also they need to make people more aware of principles of collecting household waste.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
As the population is growing all around ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...; instructing people is needed as well. Consumers definitely need regulati...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 828, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...just by formulating rules; every single persons cooperation is needed on this planet. C...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do so, people also need education. Indeed, most people want to cooperate wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...do not know what recyclable waste is. To sum up, in order to increase the rate...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 30.3222958057 195% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1373.03311258 156% => OK
No of words: 411.0 270.72406181 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.199513382 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90764132624 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 145.348785872 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54501216545 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 419.366225166 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.7962385973 49.2860985944 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5625 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430922689347 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128481406296 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891215222368 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269206345412 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130286874045 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 63.6247240618 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.