Some technology provides smart cars
The author and the lecturer talk about smart cars. According to the reading passage, the author talks about the benefits of advanced automobiles. The lecturer, however, opposes the claims made by the writer.
First, the author talks about the reduction in car accidents. He says that smart cars will be equipped with a variety of sensors so it will help to prevent collisions on road. The professor refutes the idea. She says that some automatic cars have failed occasionally. Further, she adds that when highways will be more occupied with cars than accidents can even become worse because all these vehicles will closely follow each other.
Second, the writer mentions about the reduction in traffic problems and increase in commutation time. Evidently, if computer-controlled cars will follow each other and traffic regulations then it will definitely reduce traffic problems and also increase the highway speed. The lecturer denies the fact. She mentions that when people will start to opt the smart cars, the crowd will increase on the road, and it will decrease the car speed.
Lastly, the author says that automatic cars will cause a reduction in the cost of driving. Additionally, people will spend less on car maintenance because expensive items which are used in the vehicle are more reliable than other products.
The speaker opposes the statement. She says that even though parts of smart cars are more reliable and durable but if they get damaged then it will cost more than the repair and replacement of the unconventional vehicles. Consequently, it will not save money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1583011583 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65535470381 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528957528958 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1974264059 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5882352941 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2352941176 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165750658005 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559205509523 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562487037329 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096271371557 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435372548888 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.