Soon there will be something new for the tourist who has been everywhere and seen everything on Earth. Spacecraft being developed by private commercial companies will soon enable private citizens to buy their own tickets to travel into space, thereby creating a space tourism industry. so far, space travel has been undertaken only by governments, but the new, privatized spaceflight industry will bring great benefits to both science and the public.
First, private space travel will benefit serious space exploration by making spaceflight cheaper. Privatization of space technology will bring technological costs down very fast because it will allow competition--and competition is one of the strongest motivators to cut costs. Thus, lowering the cost of space travel will benefit not only space tourists but also scientists, who will be able to use private space flights for research purposes.
Furthermore, privatization of space travel will accelerate the rate at which important scientific discoveries occur. the aerospace industry already sponsors a lot of groundbreaking scientific research, and adding private spaceflight companies to it will make the industry as a whole grow in size, thereby employing more scientists than it does now. that increased number of working scientists means not only that more discoveries are likely to be made but also that those discoveries are likely to be made more quickly than in the past.
Finally, when governments are the sole providers of space travel, the costs are paid for by the whole taxpaying public, but with privatization, the expenses of space travel will be borne by the customers of the industry. The fact that private spaceflight operators will be able to raise funds through ticket sales means that the financial burden on taxpayers will be eased significantly.
The article and lecture are about the privatization of spaceflights. The article states that
the privatization of the space industry will benefit everyone. He provides three reasons for how it will benefit. However, the Professor casts doubt on what the article states and refutes each of the other reasons.
To begin with, the article claims that private space travel will benefit serious space
exploration by making spaceflight cheaper. It also mentions that the lower cost of space travel will benefit scientists who can use private space flights for research purposes. However, The professor rebuts this claim by stating that privatization will only increase the cost of spaceflight. He says that space control system for operation of more flights, safety testing and maintaining issues all this will eventually add to the increase in costs of space flight.
Second, privatization will accelerate the rate at which discovery is occurring due to more and more scientists will be hired by aerospace industries due to the low cost of space travel. In contrary, the professor states that private companies will be hiring more scientists by paying heavy salaries and thus the scientists will be working more on commercial agenda rather than research work. Thus this will decline the rate of discoveries.
Third, the article posits that since the government is the only provider of space travel this is causing more burden on the whole taxpaying public. Since privatization will be able to raise funds through the tickets thus it will reduce the burden on the taxpayer and the expenses of the space industry will be borne by the customers of the industry only. However, the lecturer opposes this point by pointing out that the privatization will require billions of dollars to establish a space station, airport, etc since no private companies will be able to raise this huge fund and will require subsidies from the government. This will eventually impose more burden on the taxpayer because of more tax will be taken by the government to help privatization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rcial agenda rather than research work. Thus this will decline the rate of discoveri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, third, thus, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 5.04856512141 396% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2005988024 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72008088932 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467065868263 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5066020273 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307896399693 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127229188734 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653018745212 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170975208329 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623380367418 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.