Spartacus' story
Both the reading and the writing are about several aspects of Spartacus' story which have made him a hero. While the reading provides three reasons why Spartacus became an appealing hero, the professor says that they are based on inaccurate information. She adds that whereas he is a real man who won lots of battles and fought against the Roman people, the stories behind being a hero are not accurate.
First, the author says that Spartacus and his men's principal aim in fighting against Rome was to find homes and returning back them. The professor, however, mentions that not only they wanted to return back their homes, but also they wanted to take revenge and wealth as well. They cleared the routes in their first battle and in this way, they could conquer the city and take as many precious items as they could which are not admirable purposes.
Besides, the writer states that Spartacus was a military brilliant and this feature made him won the battles. The professor refutes this claim by saying that Roman people didn't take Spartacus and his men very seriously and as a result, sent their poorly trained army to battle against them. Consequently, in these battles, Spartacus and his men won the fight. After sending the best soldiers to the battle against him, the Roman people were the winner. As a result, it is concluded that he was not a brilliant hero and leader as well.
Furthermore, the author says that Spartacus was the one who liberated all Roman slaves. The professor disputes this claim and says that it is based on inaccurate information. She alludes that people already knew who created this policy and why. In the 18th century Europe, European people were practicing anti-slavery themselves but the play writers and other people were seeking to have an inspirational hero so they chose Spartacus to become their hero.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returning'.
Suggestion: returning
...ting against Rome was to find homes and returning back them. The professor, however, mentions ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
..., mentions that not only they wanted to return back their homes, but also they wanted to ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... this claim by saying that Roman people didnt take Spartacus and his men very serious...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, so, well, whereas, while, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87301587302 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40151124 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51746031746 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0653459909 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216220041156 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762010974605 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784256712342 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134382781828 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822140667547 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.