Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture speak about the possibility of living on Venus, which is one of the planets that is different from the Earth. The reading shows that living on Venus is impossible for three main reasons. The lecture, however, speaks that living on Venus can be possible to some extent by some refinements of these problems. The following both of them are elaborated.
First, the reading claims that because of higher atmospheric pressure at Venus in comparison with the Earth' atmosphere, anything which is landed on Venus will be crushed. On the other hand, the lecture argues that this problem can be solved by establishing a station above the surface of Venus. Moreover, it alludes that pressure for 50 kilometers is equal to the normal pressure on the Earth.
Secondly, the reading claims that there are no reservoirs of water on the surface of Venus, and its atmosphere is made up of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid, which means there is no oxygen there. However, the lecture alleges that these chemical compounds can be used to make water and therefore there is no need to import water there.
Third, the reading says that because of thick clouds, which covers Venus's atmosphere, sunlight cannot be reached to the Venus. In addition, there are dens layers of carbon dioxide under these thick clouds, which blocks the sunlight. The lecture, though, discusses that there are some clouds over Venus but they are not thick. Furthermore, this reflected sunlight tend to be used to produce electricity in an efficient manner. Therefore, by such a useful way, solar electricity can be achievable for human beings.
All in all, the reading claims that human beings' living on the Venus is not possible, whereas the lecture refuses it and shows that there are some practical solutions for those problems which can bring life on the venus for individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s is impossible for three main reasons. The lecture, however, speaks that living on...
^^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... by some refinements of these problems. The following both of them are elaborated. ...
^^^
Line 6, column 403, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient manner" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... tend to be used to produce electricity in an efficient manner. Therefore, by such a useful way, solar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, whereas, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00318471338 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51383651241 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3732708563 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.733333333 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131598471485 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490076771635 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301671391536 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780777814055 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00729598683226 0.0443174109184 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.