Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading passage talks about the three inaccurate and unreliable events recorded in Chevalier’s memoir. The lecturer does not agree with the passage and suggests the opposite.
Firstly, the author of the passage says that claims made by Chevalier in the memoir about his affluence while living in Switzerland are false because he was seen borrowing money from a Swiss merchant. However, the professor finds this reasoning flawed and suggests that since he spends a huge amount of money on gambling and parties, a lot of money has been used up and it takes time to convert wealth into money. So, he has to borrow it from someone until he could get money from his wealth.
Furthermore, the author says that Chevalier’s account of his conversations with Voltaire cannot be accurate because the conversations happened years ago. So, it is impossible that someone could remember the exact phrases for a long time. Again, the professor does not agree with this and says that Chevalier used to make notes of his conversations with Voltaire at night after their talk. To substantiate his argument, the lecturer said that many witnesses confirmed the details of the talk mentioned in the memoir.
Lastly, the author cites that the prison escape from the rooftop of prison in Venice is not true because Chevalier had political connections in Venice so he could easily bribe the jailers to free him. The professor does not agree with it and says that other prisoners who had more powerful political contacts than Chevalier couldn’t bribe the jailers. Also, the Venice police documents confirm this by mentioning a ceiling repair of the Chevalier’s cell.
In conclusion, the author and the professor have conflicting views. Thus, it would be difficult for them to come to a common ground.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, thus, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10135135135 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67734728019 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5324708702 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0600256523227 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252105214444 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336948684184 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0420827705324 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395769876993 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.