Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The article explains about a topic called salvage logging and provides three reasons to support the idea. However, the professor explains that salvage logging can be a great threat to the environment of forest and refutes each of the author's reason.
First, the reading claims that after a devastating fire, forests are choked with dead trees and this trees will take years to decompose. So, removing this dead tree will make a room for fresh growth. The professor refutes this point by saying that decomposing dead trees are so much beneficial for their future generation. When a dead tree decomposes, the soil of forest get nutrients and necessary elements which makes the soil more fertile. So, cleaning up dead trees after a disaster is not a good idea.
Second, the article posits that decaying wood is a highly suitable habitat for insects which is very harmful for the other trees. On the the hand, the professor claims that dead trees are not only suitable habitat for harmful insects but also for helpful insects and birds. This birds and insects plays an important role for the sound environment in the forest.
Third, the reading says that this salvage logging can be beneficial to the economy of the country and it will create more jobs. On the contrast, the professor opposes this point by explaining that this procedure is so much expensive and sometimes they may have to use helicopter for this. Furthermore, it will create only temporary jobs because devastating fires and severe storms will not happen all the time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...is very harmful for the other trees. On the the hand, the professor claims that dead tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...is very harmful for the other trees. On the the hand, the professor claims that dead tr...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 275, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...but also for helpful insects and birds. This birds and insects plays an important ro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, may, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97683397683 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40958195142 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532818532819 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8694265094 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.1538461538 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0681461605436 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026790332202 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332487758053 0.0662205650399 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0461686492442 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345794637464 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.