Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
The professor discusses consequences of some activities slowing down the decline in frog population. The information she presents contradicts facts outlined in the reading passage.
First the lecturer mentions that farmers use pesticides in order to reduce crop loss. Since the farmland subjecting to pests are different regarding to be in neighboring with frog habitats, it would not be fair and economical for all the farmers to be prohibited using pesticides, since they may loose more crops in comparison with other farmers. On the other hand, according to the passage prohibiting farmers from using lethal pesticides near vulnerable frog population will lead to reduction the harm pesticides cause to frogs.
Second, the speaker states that the solution of treating frogs must be exerted individually, which is a hard work. In addition, if the cure works properly with frog the danger still threatens its off-springs and needs to be done individually. However, the reading specifies that sensitive frog would be safe if anti-fungal medication is exerted.
Third, the professor points out that basically more than human activity, it is global warming that mainly contribute to threatening their habitats. In contrast, the reading makes it clear that frogs habitat are threatened by human activity like draining of wetlands and excessive water use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ibited using pesticides, since they may loose more crops in comparison with other far...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, still, third, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45238095238 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8828565136 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.540411800872 123% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5411486096 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101012097659 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398674531943 0.0996497079465 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346506243738 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586202391226 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103246843223 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.