The professor discusses the arguments against the belief that dinosaurs are endotherms. The information she presents contradicts facts outlined in the reading passage.
First, the lecturer mentions that discovering dinosaur fossils in Polar Region does not necessarily imply that dinosaurs are endotherms. Plus, it is possible that Polar Region perhaps was warmer than today, even warm enough that non-endotherms animals could live in. Moreover, it is probable that they would hybernated when the weather of that area had become cold. On the other hand, according to the passage since only animals with body temperature much higher than Polar Region can live there along with the fact that dinosaur fossils finding defenitly shows that they were endotherms.
Second, the speaker states that leg position of dinosaurs under their body helped them carry their bulky body and their massive weight. Then legs locating underneath the body does not necessarily serve for running. However, the reading specifies that since all endtherms legs located underneath the body like dinosaurs, then dinsosaurs were endotherms.
Third, the professor points out that although dinosaurs skeleton and bone structure were full of Haversian canals, there were also growth rings in order to lower the rate of growth during cold weather. Next, when the weather became warmer, they start growing again and these events occurred periodically. In contrast, the reading makes it clear that because of the existence of Haversian canals in their bone structure, dinosaurs used them in order to have rapid body growth which a special feature of endtherms animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...body and their massive weight. Then legs locating underneath the body does not ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47035573123 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52617103457 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4974746831 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410537436472 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127012926716 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721440136179 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206388244533 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653586114295 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.