Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The provided materials are concerned with extinction of Torreya and the possible ways to preclude it. According to the reading passage there are three amandment in order to limite extinction of these type of trees. In contrast the lecturer repudiates these solutions through several counterarguments that are as follows.
Initially, the author says that due to faviorable microclimate of North Florida by relocating Torreya to such a wet and cool place in order to boost the growth of this type of plant. However, the professor explains that microclimates are considerably affected by larger climates. Therefor, it is probable that this wet microclimate drain ensuing the global warming, and leads to a failure in the growth of Torreya.
Second, the writer thinks that by transfering Torreya to a place far from Florida microclimate which has a cold weather, they can inhibit its extinction. Yet again, the speaker underscores that this planning may cause another problem. She provides an example of Black Locase tree which were moved to another area. Although they have spread so quickly, they killed other plants which were also in danger of extinction.
Finally the passage declares that another approach is to keep TOrreya in a research center aiming to protect them run researche on them. On the other hand the narrator clarifies that in order to study a species of plant it is required to have a host of them in the area and what is more the diversity of other plants, and the effect those plants may have on Torreya could be studied. Besides, for a tree to survive diseases, it is important to be plentiful in numbers which is not possible in a limited research area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...e extinction of these type of trees. In contrast the lecturer repudiates these solutions...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ich were also in danger of extinction. Finally the passage declares that another appro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, however, if, may, second, so, in contrast, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97153024911 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75532644377 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.337062915 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.067914956094 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245382844656 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235136809069 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0396254585971 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164322154844 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.