Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the passage and the lecture deals with the question whether if it is beneficial to use nuclear power. Although the passage clearly states that they have a lot of negative impacts, the lecturer argues the points made in the passage and reaches a different conclusion in each case.
Firstly, according to the passage, nuclear energy resources will pose a significant problem for future generations since the majority of the nuclear power creates nuclear waste that is extremely dangerous for human health. However, the lecturer opposes this idea by claiming that using nuclear resources causes fewer deaths than the pollution that is caused by other resources of energy such as coal based resources. Additionally, he says that even renewable sources of energy cause more devastating effect on nature. Therefore, nuclear energy is more advantageous in terms of the damage it results.
Secondly, the lecturer addresses the problem which is about the duration of the nuclear waste. Furthermore, he suggests that we are currently working on possible solutions and we will come up with a more explicit one eventually. Moreover, he says that this will be a short term problem because there are monetary incentives involved and that we are not in a rush.
Finally, the lecturer disagrees with the idea that we can count on solar and wind energy system since these energy source do not supply a perpetual energy when the weather conditions change. Consequently, we need nuclear power to provide us consistent energy when it is not windy or sunny.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
... the passage and the lecture deals with the question whether it is beneficial to use nuclear power. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 501, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ause more devastating effect on nature. Therefore nuclear energy is more advantageous in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this energy' or 'these energies'?
Suggestion: this energy; these energies
...t on solar and wind energy system since these energy source do not supply a perpetual energy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18032786885 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64249887843 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598360655738 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6667772615 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09818038835 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404082476572 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719285273988 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752841892612 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964408629764 0.0443174109184 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.