Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.

The article is about the imposing policy of high taxes on unhealthy products like cigrettes just for social benefits and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor in the lecture refutes this argument considering it unconvincing and challenges all the reasons mentioned in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading avers that the increase in taxes will decrease the buying of un wanted things.The professor believes there are flaws in the author's position and oppose this point by saying that high taxes will force consumers to buy cheap products which are more harmful because the low quality ingredients used in it which put the health of individual on high risk. Moreover, they continously buy unhealthy food even it is expensive and spend less money on healthy food. Therefore, the speaker finds this argument in the passage to be invalid.
Secondly, the author of the passage claims that, these taxes should be paid by only smokers and people who buy unhealthy food. In contrast, the lecturer rejects the point by indicating that, there are two types of people one with low income and high income. For example, if both buy a pack of cigraette so it will become expensive for person whos earning is less and it is not fair because it will become a burden for them. Thus, the point in the lecture oppose the article.
Finally, the text outlines that high taxation on cigarettes significantly increase the benefits of government.The professor says that the claim is problematic. He explains that government made many projects of million dollars in town and it is depends on the taxation and do not want to lose it. In addition, government have right to imply law that these unhealthy things are not allowed in parks or public places but they do not apply it otherwise it will stop their income. Hence, the point from the text can not be supported by evidence.
It is quite visible that the writer and the lecture hold very different prespectives on policy of taxes.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sor in the lecture refutes this argument considering it unconvincing and challeng...
^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...decrease the buying of un wanted things.The professor believes there are flaws in ...
^^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s.The professor believes there are flaws in the authors position and oppose this ...
^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
... so it will become expensive for person whos earning is less and it is not fair beca...
^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...tly increase the benefits of government.The professor says that the claim is proble...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92261904762 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57051901903 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7058176026 49.2860985944 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167747779407 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617725081566 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518007197705 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787764747432 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345214773961 0.0443174109184 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.