Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage

Both reading and listening passage are about bees that exist on earth 200 million years ago. The reading passage says bees not exist on earth as early as 200 million years ago and shows some doubt and provides 3 reasons of support. While the lecture oppose writer and says bees exist that time.
First and foremost, the reading avers that no fossil of bees have ever found before 100 million years ago. The professor believes there are flaws in the author's position and oppose this point by indicating that the reason bees can not be preserved before beacuse the fossilized trees have substance called raisin which is a sticky liquid which helps to preserve and it was rare and later become very common so that does not mean there were no bees.
Secondly, the text outlines that the flowering plants first appeared 125million years ago. Nevertheless, the lecture posits that early bees depend on the non flowering plants like ferns and pine trees and when flowering plants evolved they adapt their feeding and with evolved flowers made a new stable relation ever since.
Finally, the author brings this argument to a close by suggesting that the structure lack some basic things of bees nest. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that evidence shows the early bees protect their nest by a water proof substance made of different chemical composition. Furthermore, analysis shows that same water proofing material use by modern bees. Thus, the professor considers this point in the passage to be invalid.
It is quite visible that the author and the lecturer hold conflicting views on bees existence. It is clear that they will have trouble in finding common ground on this topic.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
... the early bees protect their nest by a water proof substance made of different chemical co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
... the lecturer hold conflicting views on bees existence. It is clear that they will h...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95155709343 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3026427269 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553633217993 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0488203028 49.2860985944 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.076923077 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154885285051 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548922963301 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494765454136 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767682120854 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223169128546 0.0443174109184 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.