The reading and the lecture both are about Pterosaurs. The professor in the talk mentions that Pterosaurs were capable of powered flight. However, the article casts doubt on the claims made by the professor. The reading suggests that heavy Pterosaurs were not able to power flight and provides three explanations.
To begin with, the professor in the talk asserts that recent studies from fossils of Pterosaurs reveal that Pterosaurs have a dense thick hair-like covering, which is fur-like and this indicates that they are warm-blooded. In addition, he mentions that when the temperature outside is cold they increase their body temperature. If the metabolism is same as warm-blooded then it is evident that Pterosaurs have the energy for Powered-flight. The reading, on contrary, refutes the point made by the professor, the article states that modern-reptiles are cold blooded like their ancestors, and thus they have low-energy and metabolism and cannot power flight.
Moreover, The lecturer contends that though the pterosaurs have a huge and heavy body. Their bone is light and hollow, which makes them lightweight and thus they are able to fly. The article challenges the point made by the lecturer. According to the article, the pterosaurs are heavyweight reptiles, which cannot fly in the air.
Lastly, the professor posits that the pterosaurs use all the four-limbs to push themselves from the ground like the bat and it enables the pterosaurs to powered-flight. This point is contradicted by the article. It affirms that large reptiles need big powerful muscles in their back to launch themselves from the ground to fly, which pterosaurs don't have. Thus, this reptile cannot jump high in the air.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as warm-blooded 'as'".
Suggestion: as
... the metabolism is same as warm-blooded then it is evident that Pterosaurs have the ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 346, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rom the ground to fly, which pterosaurs dont have. Thus, this reptile cannot jump hi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, moreover, so, then, thus, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27372262774 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86523314552 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518248175182 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.7726333161 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3125 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223273995677 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815340014544 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458543749972 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147496813219 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377511933191 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.