Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about whether it is the right or responsibility of people to vote . The author of the reading state that every citizen must be responsible and should compulsorily vote to form democracy. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions it should be their preference to vote or not and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that compulsion for voting offer people an opportunity to numerous people in making strong democracy because of the huge number of votes. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that there might be the possibility of not liking any of the candidate. Nevertheless, if they are compelled to vote then this will made their right unethical.
Secondly, according to the writing, there is plummeting in voter's participation. Additionally, the day is not so far when there would be only members of the candidates at the poll. Thus, making it compulsory to vote ensures majority of people participates in voting. Infact, this is what the true democracy wants. The speaker on other hand points out that obtaining few vote is not that bad instead this will question the legitimacy and thus lead to artificial law.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that there is a right of freedom in US. In addition, government work for people and people regulate the government however if they enforced the system of voting to be mandatory then elected official could claim greater legitimacy. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that some people might not have interest and do not care about the politics at all. Furthermore, they might be ill informed which eventually affect the electoral process.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on right to vote. The speaker effectively challenges the writer's argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ight or responsibility of people to vote . The author of the reading state that ev...
^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ld compulsorily vote to form democracy. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions it shou...
^^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...ey are compelled to vote then this will made their right unethical. Secondly, acco...
^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun vote seems to be countable; consider using: 'few votes'.
Suggestion: few votes
...on other hand points out that obtaining few vote is not that bad instead this will quest...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... The speaker effectively challenges the writers argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05161290323 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76809845963 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1135926428 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148542263155 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421830841875 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401202834066 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768124129209 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402249921014 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.