Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
According to the passage, R Robustus were scavengers instead of being hunters of dinosaurs and often fed on dinosaur's eggs. However, the lecturer refutes to this claim made by saying that they were hunters of dinosaurs and supported her arguments with some evidence.
Firstly, it has been claimed in the passage that the R Robustus were smaller than Psittacosaur therefore, it is impossible for R Robustus to eat dinosaurs similar to the size of Psittacosaur. Where as the lecturer states that even the R Robustus were smaller than the fully grown Psittacosaur, it could be that R Robustus ate its baby because R Robustus is twice as large as the baby found in the stomach.
Secondly, the passage mentions that the length and the positioning of the legs of R Robustus made it a slow moving animal. There is no possibility that such a slow moving animal eats up a fast moving Psittacosaur. However, the lecturer disagrees to this explanation by supporting it to the evidence of modern animal that has its leg positioned similar to the ancient R Robustus that runs fast and the length of the legs of this modern animal does not restrict it from moving fast therefore, the positioning of legs has nothing to do with movement.
Lastly, the passage states that there are no teeth marks on the body found in R Robustus's stomach because it was swallowed as an egg. However, the lecturer says that the R Robustus had powerful large jaws that they used for swallowing and did not require them to chew therefore, it probably swallowed the dinosaur's baby and did not require to chew the small body.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...rs similar to the size of Psittacosaur. Where as the lecturer states that even the R Rob...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'chewing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: chewing
... the dinosaurs baby and did not require to chew the small body.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79347826087 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70716675472 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45652173913 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8448138844 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.056350808028 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304530074388 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349805435274 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0393913958171 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375522724309 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.