Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the point made in the article
The reading and the lecture are both about how reward system helps to increase productivity among workers. The author of the reading believes that rewarding some workers ia able to increase their productivity, in vertue of competition. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He states that all those methods are able to be disproved.
First of all, the author points out that privileges for some workers are able to increase productivity, because workers will try to get those bonuses. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that all rewards are promote punishment, which is able to decline productivity among workers.
Secondly, the author contends that workers, who perform their work the best way, will have some rewards. So this helps to increase motivation for workers. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that workers do not like to feel that they are manipulated by their superior.
Finally, the author states that this is vital to make the correct rewards system to achieve a high productivity, because people like different types of rewards. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that due to reward system, workers will start to hide their mistakes and problems, because they will try to avoid a punishment or bad ratings.
In conclusion, i would like to say that there are a lot of reason to install the reward system, but no one of them unproved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...productivity, in vertue of competition. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'promoted'.
Suggestion: promoted
... lecturer. He says that all rewards are promote punishment, which is able to decline pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rewards'' or 'reward's'?
Suggestion: rewards'; reward's
... that this is vital to make the correct rewards system to achieve a high productivity, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ishment or bad ratings. In conclusion, i would like to say that there are a lot ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96186440678 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63272706437 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53813559322 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9006272398 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6428571429 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104497470393 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501732049171 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838536368853 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0535009944159 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485693880324 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.