summarize the points in the passage, being sure to explain how they address the specific concerns about forest fires described in the reading passage.
In the reading passage, the author states that many citizens required to replacing the 'let it hurn' policy with a policy of extinguishing forest fire as soon as they appeared because of the large scale of the damage caused by the forest fire. However, the professor refutes this idea and holds the point that the reasons listed in the reading are unconvincing.
First of all, according to the reading passage, the Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and vegetation on account of the trees were charred and small plants were incinerated after the fires finally dies out. While the professor believes that it is an opportunity for new plants to grow since the forest fires destroyed the plants that could not survive. Smaller plants that needed an open ground to grow took the place of trees that destroyed by the big fires. Some seeds wonld not germinated unless they are exposed to high levels of heat.
What is more, the statement in the reading material indicates that fires als did harm to animals due to the destruction of habitats and the disruption of food chain. In contrast, the professor challenges this statement by pointing out that population of animals will recover soon. For example, the small plants that replaced the trees after the fires created an ideal habitat for certain animals which will also attract predators to come. Therefore, the food chain became much stronger than they were before.
Finally, the auther of the reading claims that the ires destroyed the value of the park as a tourist attraction thus had negative consequences for the local economy. In the contrast, the professor argues that the Yellowstone forest fires was an unusual combination of sevevral factors such as low rainfall, strong winds and dry undergrowth. In this case, the fire would not happen every year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in contrast, such as, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97719869707 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50240894454 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547231270358 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.893283779 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.538461538 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146841080401 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513348190498 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322797562755 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958191736156 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379471822721 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.