Teacher should not go to television program
The reading states that nowadays the presence and intentional ongoing to the television by the professor has legions effect as a whole for the betterment of society, which is why he provides three logic as support. However the professor explains that it has a enormous pitfalls rather than conveniences and so he refutes three of the logic of the reading with an tenable ways.
First, the reading claims that professor deems that if he goes to television as a prime guest in an educational or contemporary program, surely t will create a huge fuel for his appearance. He deems that due to a reputed teacher, all will follow him. Besides, in the journal paper only few students keep notion about him and his research. But in this case, all audience will accept him with proper respect. Turning to the other side of the logic, the professor says by refuting this, certainly its effect is very pernicious. When he intends to deliver speech in the television, his mentality will rush in that manner. On the other hand his concern to research area will decimate. Not only that but also in order to be a TV celebrity, he will use all of his sap and contrivance how he looks in the TV, takes time to go to center.
Second the article posits that when a knowledgeable person sits as a speech holder in the television, no doubt all people enthrall to watch the program. As a result the university will use this reputation to grab new students into their campus by publicizing their aspects to the mass people. Moreover, the students will quench their thirst of knowledge by focusing ins and outs of that view. Conversely, the lecture opines in the reverse direction here. It says that for grabbing the publicity, the professor will be earnest to go TV center by traveling which consumes time, he will prepare of draft which is another reason to be wastage. Moreover, such endeavors will go in vain as students are not so serious about it.
Third, the reading claims that since people get low advantages by exposing to the professor, so it obviously enhances their knowledge and can learn their momentous views. In this case the lecture overturns these notions and refers that this opportunity is a mirage. Actually after dinner every people want to relish entertainment, not deliberation about a topic. So it will not enthrall them. Besides, generally professor comes in TV in a literary program which knowledge is available to mass people from news and reports. Why they use their time to hear again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...why he provides three logic as support. However the professor explains that it has a en...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ever the professor explains that it has a enormous pitfalls rather than convenien...
^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'pitfall'?
Suggestion: pitfall
...ofessor explains that it has a enormous pitfalls rather than conveniences and so he refu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... three of the logic of the reading with an tenable ways. First, the reading clai...
^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...he logic of the reading with an tenable ways. First, the reading claims that profe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: LOOK_WATCH[2]
Message: Did you mean 'watches'?
Suggestion: watches
...e all of his sap and contrivance how he looks in the TV, takes time to go to center. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l people enthrall to watch the program. As a result the university will use this r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, conversely, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, third, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1373.03311258 151% => OK
No of words: 432.0 270.72406181 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64833834463 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 145.348785872 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 419.366225166 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5655617299 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0909090909 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0931646231686 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241665190884 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342433329994 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0523354999264 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232288026664 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 63.6247240618 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.