Tidal Powers
The reading and lecture both discuss 'Tidal Powers'. The reading states that tidal power can be used as a better alternative source of energy. However, the professor explains that the use of tidal powers as a possible alternative energy should be considered critically.
First of all, the passage mentions that tidal power can contribute in generation of electricity. However, the professor points that this electricity that is generated can only be used to meet fraction of total need of the country due to its location. Moreover, she says that it would not be wise to threaten the environment for generation of only small amount of energy.
In addition, the lecture also points out that the barrage and dams mentioned in the reading can disturb several migratory fishes to migrate between sea and river. Furthermore, the professor also counters the possible argument of making a barrage that allows fishes to migrate claiming that it would be very expensive to do so.
Also, the professor mentions that the quality of water in estuary area would decline as the salinity is increased due to sea water. She also adds that the entire inter tidal habitat would be in danger. According to professor, humans might also have problem with the plan of generating electricity using tidal energy. She says that the fishing boats that the people use are suited for the rivers and they would not be able to navigate properly in open sea. The professor therefore explains that this would hamper the economy and trade of the region as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e both discuss Tidal Powers. The reading states that tidal power can be used as a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94941634241 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5365770394 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513618677043 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2962318176 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8461538462 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220739164081 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105023450988 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128828866624 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155236561732 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149543996493 0.0443174109184 337% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.